(Sorry, I had missed this call for adoption.)
As far as I can tell, this is a bad idea. It asks the network to do
significant extra work in order to provide a small improvement in the
performance of the hosts. Under the rare circumstance that the host is
sending a very large amount of data in a single application, and that
data transfer is rate limited by the I/O rate of the host and there is
no contention for network resources that will reduce the fandwidth
available to the sending host.
I do not think int-area (or any other IETF working group) should adopt
this work.
Yours,
Joel
On 6/22/2022 3:25 PM, Juan Carlos Zuniga (juzuniga) wrote:
Dear IntArea WG,
We are starting a 2-week call for adoption of the IP-Parcels draft:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-templin-intarea-parcels-10.html
The document has been discussed for some time and it has received
multiple comments.
If you have an opinion on whether this document should be adopted by
the IntArea WG please indicate it on the list by the end of Wednesday
July 6^th .
Thanks,
Juan-Carlos & Wassim
(IntArea WG chairs)
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
Int-area@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
Int-area@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
