Tom, > On Apr 8, 2022, at 5:02 AM, tom petch <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Int-area <[email protected]> on behalf of Michael Sweet > <[email protected]> > Sent: 07 April 2022 15:11 > Re: [Int-area] [Iotops] Last Call: Moving TPC.INT and NSAP.INT infrastructure > domains to historic > > Michael > > I am well familiar with the work of IPP in the IETF. You mention MIBs which > I know of. Is there anything similar in YANG?
Not that I am aware of, but doing a YANG model for IPP to allow configuration via NETCONF is certainly feasible - the IPP model and semantics are well insulated from the transport and implementation/encoding details. In fact, the Printer Working Group spent quite a few years developing an XML schema for the IPP model and semantics (RFC 8011) and various printing MIBs, what is known collectively as the PWG Semantic Model. However, its usage has been limited to bridging mechanisms with other vendor/standard printing models since IPP is generally able to work everywhere... ________________________ Michael Sweet
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
