Last email was the main point I wants to get across. Now to answer your questions inline.
> On Dec 6, 2021, at 4:28 AM, Luigi Iannone <g...@gigix.net> wrote: > > Having said that, this is not caused by addressing itself, right? Right, IMHO. > Certainly large addresses eat a lot of that MTU space. Well true as well as overlay encapsulation. > I wonder if we are able to describe this as a possible way to add features. > Assuming we are able somehow to get rid of the MTU issue, it seems we gain a > degree off freedom, how this translates specifically for the addressing? I think the question is Luigi is, does the user notice an improvement in network performance by sending larger packets? If so then the MTU issues we see as geeks at the network layer should be fixed. But note it’s hard (read: really hard if not impossible) to upgrade the underlay. Dino _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
