Hi, Jeffery, et al., Sorry for the delayed response; I might have responded, but can't find it so I'll possibly duplicate or just be late.
The latest version of this doc was: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels-00 That was issued largely as a filename change, though. The content is identical. Although the work has been idle for a while (due to lack of WG input), the recent enthusiasm suggests - as Fred noted - we should pull this off the back-burner. I will not be at the upcoming IETF, but will have a report on the current way forward on that. Joe On 9/30/2014 1:07 PM, Jeffery Hammond wrote: > I would like to see this also. Just went back and pulled the draft > dated 3/5/2010 (I hope this is the latest one > draft-touch-intarea-tunnels-01). It would be a good starting point. As this > will only continue to grow and a central base and description would be nice. > Other than I.P. in I.P. (GTP) and IPSec what other tunneling > technologies would be considered? > > Jeff Hammond > Samsung System Engineer > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Int-area [mailto:int-area-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Templin, Fred L > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 2:16 PM > To: Suresh Krishnan; Internet Area > Subject: Re: [Int-area] (REVISED) Call for adoption of > draft-bonica-intarea-gre-mtu-06 > > I will say again what I said at the microphone in Toronto. We really ought to > move forward with "Tunnels in the Internet Architecture" > first so that other documents that discuss specific tunnel types can use it > as a point of departure (if necessary). > > So, let's have Tunnels in the Internet Architecture brought back onto the > front burner first so that other documents that come later can use it as a > normative reference. > > Thanks - Fred > fred.l.temp...@boeing.com > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Int-area [mailto:int-area-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Suresh >> Krishnan >> Sent: Monday, September 08, 2014 9:17 PM >> To: Internet Area >> Subject: [Int-area] (REVISED) Call for adoption of >> draft-bonica-intarea-gre-mtu-06 >> >> Hi all, >> This draft has been presented at intarea face to face meetings and >> has received a bit of discussion. This call is being initiated to >> determine whether there is WG consensus towards adoption of >> draft-bonica-intarea-gre-mtu-06 as an intarea WG draft. The draft is >> available at >> >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-intarea-gre-mtu-06 >> >> Please state whether or not you're in favor of the adoption by >> replying to this email. If you are not in favor, please also state >> your objections in your response. This adoption call will complete on >> 2014-09-23. >> >> Regards >> Suresh & Juan Carlos >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Int-area mailing list >> Int-area@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > Int-area@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > Int-area@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area > _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
