Uwe Brauer via "Announcements and discussions for GNUS, the GNU Emacs Usenet newsreader (in English)" <info-gnus-english@gnu.org> writes:
>> Uwe Brauer writes: > >> Have you ruled out using the message-prune-recipient-rules and >> message-dont-reply-to-names in (info "(message) Wide Reply")? They may >> be enough for you (I haven't read your code). > > Thanks, but these have very different purpose. You use them to avoid > doble sending to addresses you know in advance. > My use case is very different as I described in my first posting. So I > cannot know beforehand which address to include in one of these rules! Sorry I meant the 'message-wide-reply-to-function' in the same page. On the face of it, it seems to cover this use case: > Robert can only avoid this by using a function (before replying to > all) that checks whether the sender was included in the original > email’s *To* or *CC* fields. --
