Eric S Fraga <e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk> writes: > > Seems the variable is only respected for adaptive score files. For all > > others pretty-printing is always used. I guess your score file is not > > an adaptive one? > > I use both adaptive and permanent scores. I have: > > ((score-file . "/.../work.scores") > (adapt-file . "/.../work.adaptive.scores")) > > for my "work" topic which includes a few nnml groups. > > The score-file is small (600 bytes!) but the adaptive scores file is > around 350 kB in size. Pretty printing the score file should be > instantaneous, I would have thought. Puzzled I be!
I guess the new `pp-fill' code is not working well in your case. I'm sorry, I don't use score files, I just read some of the source code, so my insights are limited. The slowness, is it only happening for that 600 Bytes file? How do the contents of that file look like - can you share some of the contents so that we can maybe find a recipe (you can replace any private information of course)? Of course you can just use an advice if you just want to get rid of this problem. But maybe we can find out why the code is working that slowly. And...you are using a master built (from when)? TIA, Michael.
