Adam Sjøgren <a...@koldfront.dk> writes: [...]
> How did you get the clear idea with slrn? I think the explanation to this psychology is that simpler is easier to understand. I haven't used slrn in a while so I hardly remember the complaints I had there. It's coming to me now that I could only edit one article at a time there because slrn doesn't have the window concept. I had to draft an article, edit another. >> Also, my way of working is to write articles, but only post them after >> I've reviewed them. I haven't yet acquired skills enough to do that >> with Gnus. >> >> I know it's possible to save them as drafts and send them later, but I'd >> like to distinguish between partially written messages from messages >> queued for delivery. > > This might not be useful to you eiter, but you can queue messages for > sending later - they will be stored in a different group than drafts, > and automatically sent at the time you specifify (or after the interval > you specify). > > I really like that feature - maybe it can be adapted for you purpose? I'm using it now. Trying it out. I tried offline mode, but it seemed not very easy to understand how to really use it, so I'm back at online mode with some caching and using delayed articles. Thanks for suggesting. _______________________________________________ info-gnus-english mailing list info-gnus-english@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
