Ted Zlatanov <[email protected]> writes:
> On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:53:14 -0600 Tommy Kelly <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> TK> All that said. I'm new here and have invested a mere fraction of the
> TK> hours in this project that y'all have. So don't hesitate to pat me on
> TK> the head and say "Shhhh! The grown-ups are speaking." :-)
>
> Nah, that would be condescending. We do passive-aggressive :)
>
> Seriously, your feedback is appreciated. You have invested a lot of
> time fighting features and jargon that are implied or learned for many
> of the Gnus regulars, so your experience helps us. If we don't respond
> or fix things quickly (speaking for myself) it's for lack of time, not
> desire to help.
>
> Ted
>
While you're here Ted, I have had to stop using spam-split. Possibly you
can see what is wrong with this?
(setq spam-use-bogofilter t)
(setq spam-use-spamassassin t)
(require 'spam)
(spam-initialize)
(setq nnimap-inbox '("INBOX"))
(setq nnimap-split-fancy '(| (: spam-split) "INBOX"))
(setq nnimap-split-methods 'nnimap-split-fancy)
(setq nnimap-split-download-body t)
I then set the spam settings using G c on the groups I want spam-split
to process.
I get some form of sequencep errors I think it is. Sorry to be vague - I
cant post a backtrace right now but can again tomorrow if you're
interested in taking a look.
I dont *think* there is anything wrong with the above but few people
have offered up other split examples using spam-split to compare it
against. I am guessing my quoting is wrong but its hard to pinpoint from
the manual examples.
regards
r.
_______________________________________________
info-gnus-english mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
