Hi Richard, thanks for your reply. Richard Riley <[email protected]> writes:
[snip] > > Spam filtering is confusing to start with. This is apparent > from the same issues cropping up in #emacs and other resources. That > said its incredibly powerful. > > I'm not sure how group settings for "auto spam check" work when set in > conjunction with nnimap-inbox and spam-split. > > But this is how my working setup looks:- > > (setq spam-use-bogofilter t) > > (require 'spam) > (spam-initialize) > > (setq nnimap-inbox "INBOX") > (setq nnimap-split-methods 'default) > (setq nnimap-split-download-body t) > > (setq nnmail-split-fancy '(|(: spam-split))) > (setq nnmail-split-methods 'nnmail-split-fancy) > > (setq spam-autodetect-recheck-messages nil) > (setq spam-mark-ham-unread-before-move-from-spam-group t) > (setq spam-mark-new-messages-in-spam-group-as-spam t) > (setq spam-split-group "Gnus-Spam") > > In the group customisation for my INBOXs (G c) I set :- > Huh! I didn't know you could customize all this on a group by group basis. I've a lot to learn about Gnus. In the meantime, I'll try out your settings and see how it works for me. Thanks for your help, Jim > ,---- > |[X] Spam Summary Exit Processor: [Value Menu] Spam Summary Exit Processor > Choices: > | Set: > | [X] Spam: Bogofilter > | [ ] Spam: Blacklist > | > `---- > > Q: does this have to be set? Is spam-use-bogofilter in addition or a > precursor to this working? > > ,---- > | [X] Destination for spam-processed articles at summary exit: [Value Menu] > Move to multiple groups: > | [INS] [DEL] Destination group: nnimap+riley:Gnus-Spam > | [INS] > | Where spam-processed articles will go at summary exit. > `---- > > note : fully qualified. > > Its in Gnus-Spam that I can recheck. The group customisation settings > for there are: > > ,---- > | [X] Group contents spam/ham classification: > | Group contents classification for spam sorting: [Value Menu] > gnus-group-spam-classification-spam > | Spam group classification (requires spam.el). [More] > | > `---- > > the concept of "spam" and ham groups can be confusing too. mark as ham? > Its ham. Mark as spam? Its spam. The corresponding exit processors take > care. I need to reread the manual I think. e.g is INBOX a spam folder? > or a ham folder? or nothing? It certainly contains ham. And often > contains spam which I manually mark with M-d and is then moved to > gnus-spam when I exit the group. But what kind of group is it? > > ,---- > | [X] Spam Summary Exit Processor: [Value Menu] Spam Summary Exit Processor > Choices: > | Set: > | [X] Spam: Bogofilter > | > `---- > > ,---- > | [X] Destination for spam-processed articles at summary exit: [Value Menu] > Move to multiple groups: > | [INS] [DEL] Destination group: nnimap+riley:Trash > | [INS] > `---- > > ,---- > | [X] Destination for ham articles at summary exit from a spam group: [Value > Menu] Move to a group: nnimap+riley:mail > | Where ham articles will go at summary exit from a spam group. > `---- > > > ,---- > | [X] Ham mark choices: > | Set: > | [ ] gnus-del-mark > | Mark used for del'd articles. > | [ ] gnus-read-mark > | Mark used for read articles. > | [X] gnus-ticked-mark > | Mark used for ticked articles. > | [ ] gnus-killed-mark > | Mark used for killed articles. > | [ ] gnus-kill-file-mark > | Mark used for articles killed by kill files. > | [ ] gnus-low-score-mark > | Mark used for articles with a low score. > | Marks considered ham (positively not spam). Such articles will be > [More] > | > | [X] Spam mark choices: > | Set: > | [X] gnus-spam-mark > | Mark used for spam articles. > `---- > > Anyway, I hope this helps! "works for me" ... ;) > > > > > -- J Burton _______________________________________________ info-gnus-english mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
