Joel Reicher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Perhaps it's called .gnus.el instead? There was a name change, I > think, but I'm not sure why.
Either .gnus or .gnus.el will work fine. If you have a .gnus.el, you can byte-compile it, and your .gnus.elc will get used instead. But on modern hardware, the minimal performance you'll get out of that isn't worth the effort of actually running the byte-compile and the aggravation of having an out-of-date copy used preferentially. (I believe for similar reasons you could have a .emacs.el/.emacs.elc, but don't really want to these days.) --dzm _______________________________________________ info-gnus-english mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
