On 10/02/2015 10:53 AM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
Nice, it's not a big deal for us to upgrade to new versions, surely
easier than porting to Dovecot! ;)
So, maybe we can help with the implementation.
In my mind, it's almost about changing the "thread=reference" and let
it omit the subject matching, change sorting
and...maybe just this? How much hard do you think it is?
That sounds about right from what I remember of THREAD=REFERENCES (which
I co-authored and implemented) and THREAD=REFS (which I think was last
documented in 2010).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Da:* Bron Gondwana <br...@fastmail.fm>
*A:* info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
*Data:* 2 ottobre 2015 12.59.08 CEST
*Oggetto:* Re: thread=refs
No, there isn't. The conversations work in 3.0 beta contains a lot
of what would be required to efficiently implement THREAD=REFS,
but nobody has done the work to implement it.
It certainly will never be backported to the 2.4 series, which is
only getting security updates and fixes for major bugs now.
Regards,
Bron.
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015, at 18:40, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
Hi,
we have systems running cyrus 2.4.12, where thread algorithms are
only references and orderedsubject.
Is there support for the thread=refs algorithm?
Thanks
Gabriele
----
Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
To Unsubscribe:
https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus
--
Bron Gondwana
br...@fastmail.fm
----
Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
To Unsubscribe:
https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus
--
Kenneth Murchison
Principal Systems Software Engineer
Carnegie Mellon University
----
Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
To Unsubscribe:
https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus
