On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Marc Patermann < hans.mo...@ofd-z.niedersachsen.de> wrote:
> Thomas, > > Thomas Cataldo schrieb (11.03.2013 10:21 Uhr): > > >> "Note that some rights are available implicitly, for example 'anonymous' >> always has 'p' on user INBOXes, and users always have rights on mailboxes >> within their INBOX hierarchy." >> > Do you have a link? > > https://cyrusimap.org/docs/cyrus-imapd/2.4.17/overview.php#acladm > > I think Archive should qualify as "user B always has rights on mailboxes >> within the INBOX hierarchy, like the Archive folder". >> When I look at the permissions with cyradm, I have : >> >> localhost> lam user/b...@willow.vmw >> b...@willow.vmw lrswipkxtecda >> admin0 lrswipkxtecda >> a...@willow.vmw lrswipkxtecd >> >> localhost> lam user/b/arch...@willow.vmw >> admin0 lrswipkxtecda >> a...@willow.vmw lrswipkxtecda >> >> >> Do I mis-understand something or should I file a bug ? (I am using unix >> hierarchy sep + altnamespace) >> > I think this has always been this way. > If you create a subfolder it inherits the rights from the upper level and > so you have the same right for INBOX and subfolders, as long as you do not > change the rights. You can always revoke your own rights, I think. > Moving/renaming a folder has always (as far I remember for 2.2. und 2.3) > been keeping the rights with the folder. > > > Marc > The question is can we consider it a bug ? The same kind of problems happens when an IMAP client deletes a folder inside a shared folder. It renames the folder to move it to my trash and all the people that had read permissions on the shared folder start seeing Other users/me/Trash/The deleted folder in their imap clients. Another related question would be, how do you guys deal with that ?
---- Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/ To Unsubscribe: https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus
