On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Simon Matter wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >> A simple (maybee) question from an ordinary mailserver admin..... > >> > >> I was following Luc's howto when we configured our new mailserver > >> last week - and we compiled sasl according to his howto like this: > >> > >> Sasl 2.1.15 > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> ./configure \ > >> --enable-anon \ > >> --enable-plain \ > >> --enable-login \ > >> --disable-krb4 \ > >> --with-saslauthd=/var/run/saslauthd \ > >> --with-pam \ > >> --with-dblib=berkeley \ > >> --with-bdb-libdir=/usr/local/bdb/lib \ > >> --with-bdb-incdir=/usr/local/bdb/include \ > >> --with-openssl=/usr/local/ssl \ > >> --with-plugindir=/usr/local/lib/sasl2 > >> > >> Authentication are done against mysql with pam-mysql and it works > >> fine, but It turnes out that saslauthd are leaking memory faster than > > > > Its actually PAM which is leaking memory. You might be able to work > > around this problem by adding '-n 0' to your saslatuhd command line. > > > > To be precise, it's a problem of pam_mysql here. Other PAM modules like > ldap work perfect with saslauthd without leaking. Uh, we use pam_ldap here with saslauthd and had the same problem with memory leaks. Using '-n 0' worked great, no performance problems at all. Andy