* Morgan Sackett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [27-03-03 00:39]: > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote > > > Indeed. That's my setup exactly. However, I just run lmtpd -a, > bound to a > > private network where only the LMTP servers and the SMTP > servers are > > connected to. Thus, no authorization worries, and no SASL > overhead. > > Here is the error that I get using sockets: > > Mar 26 18:21:08 kang postfix/lmtp[12575]: 26CD51FE9DE: > to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, r > elay=none, delay=141474, status=deferred (connect to > /var/imap/socket/lmtp[/var/ > imap/socket/lmtp]: Connection refused) > > I'll give the -a switch a try. >
Maybe postfix cannot write to the socket (/var/imap/socket/lmtp), can you make sure the socket is writable by postfix user or the group postfix is running under ? Make sure no firewall rules are in place that can prevent you from connecting telnet-ing to the lmtp port. If you run lmtpd over localhost can you connect to localhost:lmtp ? What's netstat saying about listening ports ? mitu
