On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Josh Huber wrote: > Now, I'm pretty flexible here. I don't have any appllications which > are using SASL now (unless libldap is linked against it?) Ah, it > is...and it's linked against an older version of sasl (v1), whereas > imapd is linked against sasl2... > > Can anyone recommend a workaround for this? Should I bother > rebuilding openldap? Will it work even if I do?
Enable versioned symbols in SASL 2, and SASL 1... and rebuild all stuff against the new versions. I am talking to Rob about this, and the Debian unstable's latest package of SASL 2 has had versioning applied to its symbols by its maintainer. saslauthd might help you mitigate the problem, as well. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh
