At 01:45 AM 12/3/01 +0100, you wrote:
>this is an old problem I run into several times and found also plenty
>of postings at googles, but this time I really want to know, who the
>evil is ;)
>
>If I get a mail and pass it through procmail/formail to add an x-loop-header
>and then pass to deliver, deliver fails with an error: "Message
>contains invalid header"
>
>The reason is that formail (and not procmail !) - that always tries to
>fix the mail to be standardconform - adds one From-line at the
>beginning of the mail in a format deliver doesnt seem to like:
>
>example:  cat /tmp/mail | formail -a"X-Loop3: "server.goldfisch.at"

and this will fix the problem:

:0 fhw
  |formail -I 'From '



>the input:
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Received: from server2.local (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])\\
>         by server2.local (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id fATL5vOx015215
>...
>
>becomes to:
>
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Mon Dec  3 01:29:04 2001
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Received: from server2.local (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])\\
>         by server2.local (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id fATL5vOx015215
>...
>
>
>While this is no current problem, cause I can use the -f switch of
>formail to prevent it from doing so or use the tail-command to remove
>this line again, I am worried about it, cause maybe one day a mail
>will pass by with the same format formails wants to make and deliver
>will fail ...
>
>who is wrong in this case ? formail or deliver ?
>
>thnx,
>peter
>
>ps: the proper solution at the moment will be to let formail add this
>suspicious first line in any case and remove it with tail later. While
>this is some unwanted overhead one should be on the save side doing so
>..
>
>
>
>pps: well, the whole mail I tested is:
>
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Received: from server2.local (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
>         by server2.local (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id fATL5vOx015215
>         for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 22:05:57 +0100
>Received: (from pilsl@localhost)
>         by server2.local (8.12.1/8.12.1/Submit) id fATL5v58015212
>         for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 22:05:57 +0100
>Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 22:05:57 +0100
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: halllo
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Disposition: inline
>User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i
>X-Loop3: server.ihf-hr.org
>
>
>kdlavsklvsksvdfkvs
>teste test test test
>
>
>
>
>--
>mag. peter pilsl
>
>phone: +43 676 3574035
>fax  : +43 676 3546512
>email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>sms  : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>pgp-key available

Reply via email to