Dear Alexsandar, Unfortunately not! It will require some more time. It is a lengthy task, as it is a laborious and meticulous process that also requires us to systematically compare the Kashmiri version with the Vulgate.
Best wishes, Lyne Lyne Bansat-Boudon Directeur d'études pour les Religions de l'Inde Ecole pratique des hautes études, section des sciences religieuses Membre senior honoraire de l'Institut universitaire de France ________________________________ De : Uskokov, Aleksandar <[email protected]> Envoyé : vendredi 22 août 2025 15:53 À : Lyne Bansat-Boudon <[email protected]>; Matthew Kapstein <[email protected]> Cc : Indology List <[email protected]> Objet : Re: Mokṣopāya completed Dear Lyne, Thank you for sending this very interesting paper. Has the edition announced there been published? Best, Aleksandar Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> ________________________________ From: INDOLOGY <[email protected]> on behalf of Lyne Bansat-Boudon via INDOLOGY <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2025 9:21:45 AM To: Matthew Kapstein <[email protected]> Cc: Indology List <[email protected]> Subject: [INDOLOGY] Mokṣopāya completed Dear colleagues, All thanks for this very interesting discussion. I would like to add another stone to the edifice of reasoning. In 2018, Judit Törzsök and I published a paper entitled "Abhinavagupta on the Kashmirian Gītā. Announcement of the First Critical Edition of the Gītārthasaṃgraha, with the Reconstruction of the Text of the Kashmirian Gītā [..] and a French translation of Both Texts", in Journal of Indian Philosophy (46.1: 31-64). Its final section (an Appendix, in fact), p.50 ff., deals with the (?) Bhāskara (his identity, his place of origin, his philosophical persuasion, etc.) under consideration in the platform’s discussion. I attach the paper, hoping that our colleagues might find further information there, and perhaps new material for other conclusions. Best wishes, Lyne NB: Some of you referred to Kato 2014. It happened that while preparing the J’s paper, I came through a first draft of Kato’s paper, and that I suggested a few emendations, mostly on the reasoning; see the printed Kato’s paper. It so happens that I had access to a first version of his paper and that I suggested some amendments, primarily concerning the reasoning. Lyne Bansat-Boudon Directeur d'études pour les Religions de l'Inde Ecole pratique des hautes études, section des sciences religieuses Membre senior honoraire de l'Institut universitaire de France
_______________________________________________ INDOLOGY mailing list [email protected] https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology
