Dear Indologists,

In 2016 (Friday, 17 June 2:28pm) I shared the results of a comparison of the 
ligature formation produced by several Devanagari fonts and the results of a 
revised comparison last month (Wednesday, 12 July 2023).  I just added 
Microsoft's Sanskrit Text font to the comparison and share the results of this 
comparison as well.  A PDF of the comparison is available on The Sanskrit 
Library's Publications page at https://sanskritlibrary.org/publications.html 
under the title Sanskrit characters: a comparison of 13 fonts and their 
coverage of conjuncts.  As previously, I compared 1260 ligatures formed by the 
LaTeX Skt package with seven Unicode fonts.  The ligatures compared were the 
combined set of all those listed by Ulrich Stiehl in his document, Conjunct 
Consonants in Sanskrit, Heidelberg, 21 April 2003, pp. 4--34, and those listed 
in the Skt package documentation Sanskrit for LaTeX2e, pp. 22--35.  The full 
list of fonts compared is as follows:

1. LaTeX Skt package
2. Chandas
3. Uttara
4. Siddhanta
5. Sanskrit2003
6. Sanskrit2020
7. Shobhika-Regular
8. Shobhika-Bold
9. Sanskrit Text
10. Praja
11. Arial Unicode MS
12. Devanagari MT
13. Mangal

The LaTeX Skt package comes with the TeXLive installation available at 
https://www.tug.org/texlive/.  The Chandas, Uttara, and Siddhanta fonts were 
produced by Mihail Bayaryn.  The first two are available at 
http://www.sanskritweb.net/cakram/; all three are linked to 
http://svayambhava.blogspot.com/p/siddhanta-devanagariunicode-open-type.html.  
The Sanskrit2003 font was produced by Ulrich Stiehl and is available at 
http://www.omkarananda-ashram.org/Sanskrit/itranslator2003.htm, and the 
Sanskrit2020 font is an updated version of it that includes the VedicExtensions 
Unicode block to accommodate Vedic accents available at 
https://sourceforge.net/projects/advaita-sharada-font/files/Devanagari/.  These 
fonts are all available free of cost.  Praja was produced by Peter Freund and 
is available for $35 at 
https://secure.bmtmicro.com/servlets/Orders.ShoppingCart?CID=5115&PRODUCTID=51150002.
  The Sanskrit Text font, developed by Basit Ali, comes with Microsoft Windows; 
it can be installed by clicking the link, "Download fonts for all languages," 
in the fonts menu, and adding a language that uses Devanagari script into the 
language settings.  Arial Unicode MS is available with Microsoft Office, 
FrontPage and Publisher, with the installation of international support.  
Devanagari MT is available with Mac systems with the Asian languages support.  
Mangal is available with Windows systems with supplemental language support.

The comparison showed that the Shobhika fonts (Regular and Bold) are able to 
produce all conjuncts correctly, without the interruption of an inappropriate 
virāma, with the exception of two: ṭty and ṭṣṭh.  Siddhanta excepts just four: 
ṅkṣṇv, ṅkhn, ddbr, l̃l.  Chandas and Uttara are able to form all conjuncts 
correctly with the exception of seven sequences: ṅkṣṇv, ṅrvy, ṭhthy, dḍḍ, ddbr, 
ddvr, l̃l.  The LaTeX Skt package handles all but 29.  Sanskrit Text lacked 64, 
Sanskrit 2003 lacked 82, Sanskrit 2020 lacks 81, Praja 195, Arial Unicode MS 
208, Mangal 244, and Devanagari MT 263.

I also checked the behavior of the fonts in handling the accents in the 
Devanagari extended, and Vedic extensions Unicode pages.  Only Sanskrit Text 
font and Praja font handled them all properly, the LaTeX Skt package handles 
most Vedic accentuation, Sanskrit 2020 handles all but the Maitrāyaṇī Saṁhitā 
midstroke.  Shobhika handles all but this and the Samaveda accents.  Most fonts 
handled only the common accentual system.  A test of Vedic accents with any 
font can be performed by visiting the Sanskrit Library's interactive Vedic 
Unicode character phonetic value table at 
http://sanskritlibrary.org/accents.html.  Simply set your browser to use the 
font you would like to test.

The first ten fonts listed, i.e. Shobhika (regular and bold), Siddhanta, 
Chandas, Uttara, LaTeX Skt, Sanskrit Text, Sanskrit 2003 and 2020, and Praja, 
are therefore commendable; the last three are inadequate for Sanskrit.  Mihail 
Bayaryn's fonts use private code points to handle accents.  It would be 
desirable for him to upgrade his fonts, which otherwise handle conjuncts very 
comprehensively, to handle the Vedic characters in the two Unicode pages 
mentioned including in particular the combining candrabindu with semivowels l, 
y, and v.

Other Indic fonts not tested are described on the University of Chicago's South 
Asia Language Resource Center page at 
http://salrc.uchicago.edu/resources/fonts/available/hindi/.

Yours,
Peter

Peter Scharf
[email protected]

_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology

Reply via email to