I would like to push back on Andrew's point 3. Oh, and thank you Andrew for the clear analysis, which is very helpful!
The issue you raise in point 3 is only a problem if strings in different languages in a multilingual text are concatenated without language tagging. If a Polish author (Polish has ś) is writing about peace in Sanskrit (śānti) then the point 3 problem might arise. But it doesn't arise in the real world because of readers' implicit knowledge that these are different languages. When encoding, we should make the implicit explicit and say <polish>śląc</polish> <sanskrit>śānti</sanskrit>. We should also do this in order to get the right hyphenation and other language features (spell-checking, and whatnot). The language-tagging also does the encoding-switching: ś in Polish is one thing, ś in Sanskrit is another. In a tool like Aksharamukha, for example, the ś in śānti may become श but the one in śląc may not. Best, Dominik
_______________________________________________ INDOLOGY mailing list [email protected] https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology
