Dear Jim, The "standard" Śrīvaiṣṇava commentary on the Upaniṣads is by one Raṅgarāmānuja (as I recall, 17th century, but could not confirm it in a brief search). There is an older commentary by Kūranārāyaṇa (who may have been a student of Parāśara Bhaṭṭar, so, close to Rāmānuja's time) on the Māṇḍukya (and the Māṇḍukya is taken to be both the prose part and the verses otherwise attributed to Gauḍapāda) and, if memory serves right, on the Taittirīya; there is a commentary on the Īśā by Vedāntadeśika (and I believe by Kūranārāyaṇa too).
No doubt there is more. Best wishes, Aleksandar Aleksandar Uskokov Lector in Sanskrit South Asian Studies Council, Yale University 203-432-1972 | [email protected] "The Philosophy of the Brahma-sutra: An Introduction" https://www.amzn.com/1350150002/ https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/book/the-philosophy-of-the-brahma-sutra-an-introduction/ Office Hours Sign-up: https://calendly.com/aleksandar-uskokov ________________________________ From: INDOLOGY <[email protected]> on behalf of Jim Ryan via INDOLOGY <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2022 7:53 PM To: Indology List <[email protected]> Subject: [INDOLOGY] Viśiṣṭādvaita commentary on the Upaniṣads Hi, Rāmānuja never wrote a work that was a commentary on a full Upaniṣad like those of Śaṅkarācārya. Does anyone know of Upaniṣadic commentaries written in the Viśiṣṭādvaita tradition in either Tamil or Sanskrit? Or published scholarship relating to same? Thanks. Jim Ryan Asian Philosophies and Cultures (Emeritus) California Institute of Integral Studies
_______________________________________________ INDOLOGY mailing list [email protected] https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology
