Yes, appears close to images at https://efloraofindia.com/efi/lloydia-serotina/
On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 at 11:08, Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> wrote: > Your opinion Mr. Garg ? > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sat, Aug 23, 2025 at 11:23 AM Tabish <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Gagea serotina >> Tabish >> ------------------------------------------- >> <http://www.flowersofindia.net>www.flowersofindia.net >> The waterhole of flower lovers >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 23, 2025 at 10:15 AM Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Some confusion about the correct ID : >>> https://efloraofindia.com/species/a---l/l/liliaceae/lloydia/lloydia-himalensis >>> >>> https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77300583-1 >>> https://www.gbif.org/species/12226163 >>> https://www.catalogueoflife.org/data/taxon/CDBTS >>> http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=110&taxon_id=200027764 >>> >>> https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248677096_Notes_relating_to_the_Flora_of_Bhutan_XX_Lloydia_Liliaceae&ved=2ahUKEwiZ5PGpj6CPAxWFja8BHVYxKPsQFnoECBoQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0VfmWtjJD7AX5WAKSM6K8y >>> >>> https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://journals.rbge.org.uk/ejb/article/view/1805/1696&ved=2ahUKEwiZ5PGpj6CPAxWFja8BHVYxKPsQFnoECBYQAQ&usg=AOvVaw1EbREn3PzpRepFXpKlZAE8 >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> Saroj Kasaju >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 3:39 PM Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Should it be *Gagea himalensis *(Royle) Sameer Patil now?? >>>> https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77300583-1 >>>> https://www.gbif.org/species/12226163 >>>> https://www.catalogueoflife.org/data/taxon/CDBTS >>>> https://www.ipni.org/n/77300583-1 >>>> >>>> Thank you. >>>> >>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 9:58 PM Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Lloydia himalensis is found mention in POWO, BHL and IPNI, >>>>> all 3 interrelated but could not find in any other links. >>>>> Thank you. >>>>> >>>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 9:21 PM Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Dear Mr. Koley, >>>>>> >>>>>> It is OK. Just copied to you since you had some >>>>>> comments earlier. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>> >>>>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 9:09 PM, surajit koley < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Sir, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I do not know this species. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Surajit Koley >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 10 February 2018 at 22:33, Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Lloydia himalensis Royle ?? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ID validatioj pending ! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Saroj Kasaju >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 11:32 PM, surajit koley < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Nepal has more *Lloydia* spp. >>>>>>>>> http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=110&taxon_id=118768. >>>>>>>>> Without KEY and description along with detail on the submitted >>>>>>>>> specimen it >>>>>>>>> is impossible to id this specimen. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> One interesting aspect is that while FoN >>>>>>>>> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=110&taxon_id=242423951> >>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>> FoP >>>>>>>>> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5&taxon_id=242423951> >>>>>>>>> think *L. longiscapa* Hook. is present in China, the China flora >>>>>>>>> doesn't think so, check the end note of - >>>>>>>>> http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200027762 >>>>>>>>> ! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The key in FoP and FoC clearly state that detail on presence or >>>>>>>>> absence of hairs on filaments and tepals are essential to start with >>>>>>>>> genus. >>>>>>>>> This detail is not found in this thread. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> However, stamen to style length ratio suggests this specimen is >>>>>>>>> unlikely to be *L. longiscapa* Hook. Of-course it's guess only, >>>>>>>>> based on DSC_1141.jpg, one should not rely identifying based on a >>>>>>>>> single >>>>>>>>> flower or that of a single specimen. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thank you >>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>> surajit koley >>>>>>>>> a *non-botanist* member of >>>>>>>>> efloraofIndia google group >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 3:58 PM, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> A reply from another thread: >>>>>>>>>> "................... The plant in the link >>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/tmw7t9aQz1w/EEv-XVDz_VUJ >>>>>>>>>> looks different and probably at that time I did not considered >>>>>>>>>> L.himalensis as a possibility. Yes it looks to have longer style. If >>>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>> rely on this character it goes to L.himalensis. >>>>>>>>>> DSRawat Pantnagar" >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/tmw7t9aQz1w/EEv-XVDz_VUJ> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>>>>>>>> From: Saroj Kasaju <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> Date: 10 October 2014 at 14:10 >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Liliaceae : Lloydia longiscapa Hook. ??? >>>>>>>>>> To: efloraofindia <[email protected]>, "J.M. Garg" < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Dear Mr. Garg, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> For validation please. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Date: 26 Jul, 2014 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Location: Dolakha, Nepal >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Altitude : 12500 ft >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thank you and best wishes. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Saroj >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> With regards, >>>>>>>>>> J.M.Garg >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna' >>>>>>>>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1> >>>>>>>>>> The whole world uses my Image Resource >>>>>>>>>> <http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg> of more >>>>>>>>>> than a thousand species & eight thousand images of Birds, >>>>>>>>>> Butterflies, >>>>>>>>>> Plants etc. (arranged alphabetically & place-wise). You can also use >>>>>>>>>> them >>>>>>>>>> for free as per Creative Commons license attached with each image. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of >>>>>>>>>> Indian Flora, please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group >>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/indiantreepix> (largest >>>>>>>>>> in the world- more than 2500 members & 2,25,000 messages on 18.6.15) >>>>>>>>>> or Efloraofindia >>>>>>>>>> website <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/> (with a >>>>>>>>>> species database of more than 11,000 species & 2,00,000 images). >>>>>>>>>> Winner >>>>>>>>>> of Wipro-NFS Sparrow Awards 2014 for efloraofindia >>>>>>>>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/award-for-efloraofindia> >>>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common >>>>>>>>>> Birds of India'. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- With regards, J.M.Garg, https://efloraofindia.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFD7R9rhd2T9wCmvx8P_RNtdZ042Pd2ZNdp8FuHQGK5PGA%40mail.gmail.com.
