Thnx for the update Darren. You think there are no closed parts in opensolaris? I was under the impression that some parts are closed. If this does not stand then I see no reason why a security repo shouldn't be implemented.
________________________________ From: Darren J Moffat <[email protected]> To: George Koutras <[email protected]> Cc: Giovanni Tirloni <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected] Sent: Wed, March 24, 2010 9:37:10 PM Subject: Re: [indiana-discuss] Reporting Security Issues (Was: Free /support, /security repository for 2010.x, wider OpenSolaris usage.) On 24/03/2010 16:12, George Koutras wrote: > I think it is not that clear and easy yet. Remember osol is licensed > under ccdl and not all parts are open sourced (if I am not mistaken). > e.g. zfs is not yet fully opened, so it is still unclear and uncertain > how the suggested security repositories > would be implemented and at what extent. ZFS is and always has been fully in usr/src under the CDDL. -- Darren J Moffat _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
