Boy, that's sure a "glass half empty" kind of response. Fred has no
idea what Oracle will want to do and says as much. The update notes
that there was no response so it appears that the interest in
integrating star is lacking both within Sun and externally. He leaves
open the possibility that interest increase, either within Sun or
Oracle. This is much more an indication of the interest in star, not
in Open Solaris.

I. Szczesniak wrote:
>> With the recent re-org and Oracle transition and the unknown commitment
>> to OpenSolaris I suggest that this bug be closed again.
> 
> I heard this and other comments from Sun employees and management in
> the last week.
> Did Oracle cancel its commitment to Opensolaris? It sounds like the
> status of Opensolaris has finally changed - and the news do not look
> good.
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Fred Thornborrow <[email protected]>
> Date: Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:30 PM
> Subject: [request-sponsor] Please Close Request - 5007466
> To: [email protected]
> 
> 
> Please close this request.
> 
> The bug was updated with this update in Oct 2009:-
> 
> 
> 
> Subject:
> [Star-developers] Discussing and defining future star enhancements
> From:
> Fred Thornborrow <[email protected]>
> Date:
> Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:30:41 -0700
> To:
> [email protected]
> CC:
> Bonnie Corwin <[email protected]>
> 
> Hi Joerg,
> 
> I've been asked to review the request to integrate STAR into SFW.
> 
> I manage the consolidation and requests come into the consolidation
> across the company but I don't own each component.
> 
> I see that there is over 5 years of history with this request including
> an ARC case 2004/480.
> 
> Firstly I want to just clarify the current situation as the previous engineer
> working on this request has since left the company.
> 
> Firstly are the tasks to be done the same:-
> 
> # Add star* to /usr/sfw/bin
> # Replace /etc/rmt with rmt from star
> # Add librmt to /usr/sfw/lib
> # Modify ufsdump/ufsrestore to use librmt
> 
> 
> Once I have a good understanding of the amount of work
> involved and across which consolidations then I'll be able
> to evaluate if this project is worth progressing.
> 
> Many thanks,
> 
> Fred Thornborrow
> 
> 
> I've yet to get a response.
> 
> With the recent re-org and Oracle transition and the unknown commitment
> to OpenSolaris I suggest that this bug be closed again. If there is any
> interest within Sun or Oracle of using STAR then this bug could be reopened
> and re-evaluated again.
> *** (#4 of 4): 2009-11-25 09:43:38 PST [email protected]
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> request-sponsor mailing list
> [email protected]
> 
> 
> 

-- 
blu

It's bad civic hygiene to build technologies that could someday be
used to facilitate a police state. - Bruce Schneier
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Brian Utterback - Solaris RPE, Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Ph:877-259-7345, Em:brian.utterback-at-ess-you-enn-dot-kom
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss

Reply via email to