> W. Wayne Liauh wrote: > >> I'm working on integrating the updated font > packages > >> from the X.Org X11R7.5 > >> release, and since those involve big changes > anyway, > >> I'm fixing several other > >> issues with our font packaging at the same time. > > > > <snip> > > > > Why can't we try to duplicate the Ubuntu desktop if > this is not already being considered? > > I have no idea what that has to do with where fonts > are delivered on > the system and how they're packaged. > /usr/share/fonts does match > ere the major Linux distros install them, including > Ubuntu & Fedora. > Our package names won't match, because our packaging > system doesn't match. > > If you want to duplicate the Ubuntu desktop, that's > something to discuss > with the desktop team in desktop-discuss. > > -- > -Alan Coopersmith- > - [email protected] > Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System > em Engineering > > _______________________________________________ > indiana-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-d > iscuss
I am moving this thread to the desktop discussions. I agree that this is not the right forum. (Since the 2011 APEC is going to be held in Hawaii, we were thinking perhaps we will be able to deliver the OpenSolaris CD to some of the attendees, but if things don't change much, we are definitely not going to embarrass ourselves. Then I thought we might be able to improve the look and feel by adjusting the files in the /etc/fonts/fonts.conf directory, but this requires efforts that are beyond what we want and/or could do. ) -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
