> Will the ON version of this file be updated as well? > I understand doing > is now in Indiana only to get the change out sooner > for more test > exposure, but this seems like something that should > happen in the ON master > copy, not just Indiana's copy. > > -alan-
I agree that it should become the default in Nevada as well, but I think a separate ARC case has to be filed to make SHA256 the default for Nevada. The following statement is from the PSARC 2007/642 proposal: ... This case does NOT change the default crypt(3C) algorithm in policy.conf(4), that will be the subject of a future case, it does however update CRYPT_ALGORITHMS_ALLOW for new installs but does not do so for upgrade (since that could change an admins intended policy). ... Also note that although 2007/642 was putback in build 90, but there was an important bug fix in build 97 (6733782) that is needed for SHA256 to work correctly. -Wyllys Ingersoll -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
