Good cause that means my benchmark isn't outdated yet and I won't have to rerun for OpenSolaris.
http://www.carcinogenic-studios.com/sunspider-jscript-bench.pdf ^ If you haven't taken a look. Sorry about it not being a shiny dynamic graph, I've asked Mozilla to take a look maybe they will. :) James On Jun 18, 2008, at 9:24 AM, Evan Yan wrote: > RC2, RC3 and the final release are actually the same thing for Solaris > users (RC3 is OS-X only). > > Cheers, > -Evan > > Dennis Clarke wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Gilles Gravier <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > wrote: >> >>> That's strange... when you pkgadd that file, it says Firefox 3.0 >>> RC2 ... >>> >> >> -bash-3.2# pkginfo -l MOZfirefox >> PKGINST: MOZfirefox >> NAME: firefox 3.0rc2 for Solaris 11 >> CATEGORY: application >> ARCH: i386 >> VERSION: 3.0,REV=2008.06.05.10.52 >> BASEDIR: /opt >> PSTAMP: jdsbld1420080605105228 >> INSTDATE: Jun 18 2008 12:19 >> STATUS: completely installed >> FILES: 221 installed pathnames >> 26 directories >> 41 executables >> 129943 blocks used (approx) >> >> >>> But when you run the resulting binary, it's 3.0... package was not >>> properly >>> configured? :) >>> >> >> tough to say. >> >> I'm using it now and it seems to work. That is the first thing the >> user looks for .. does it work? >> The next thing is .. does it blow up ? It hasn't thus far and I >> won't >> know until tomorrow ( or next week ) if there is any real stability. >> >> Dennis >> _______________________________________________ >> indiana-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss >> > _______________________________________________ > indiana-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
