Is anyone following this ?
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Amit Saha <droid...@gmail.com> Date: Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 6:50 AM Subject: Re: RFC: Fedora Spin for Scientific Research Hello Bill: On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Amit Saha <droid...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello: > > On 06/03/2011 12:29 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: >> >> On 06/02/2011 09:14 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: >>> >>> Amit Saha (droid...@gmail.com) said: >>>>> >>>>> Sounds like a good start, yes. >>>> >>>> Please find the patch attached. Does this look good? >>> >>> I'd leave the sorting changes out for now. Aside from that - do we >>> need to include *both* maxima GUIs in mandatory? Why not just pick >>> the best one? >> >> (hrm, missed seeing detail of the patch, but...) >> >> speaking with my maxima maintainer hat on, I'd recommend against using >> the tk/tcl-based maxima-gui by default (or almost anywhere honestly). >> >> You really only want wxMaxima > > My bad in leaving both as mandatory. It should really be only wxMaxima. > I will take care of this change in the "final" patch I send in. So, where do > we go from here? It would be great to get an update on this, so as to enable me to re-create a spin with the updated kickstart file. My re-formatted patch is ready and I used 'xsltproc' to check the XML file and sort them within groups. (The current version lives at: https://bitbucket.org/amitksaha/custom_linux/src/c94686fe43fe/comps-f16.xml.in) Many thanks in advance. -Amit -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <http://sankarshan.randomink.org/blog> _______________________________________________ india mailing list india@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/india
