Hi Rahul, I have an issue with %configure macro.
When I do "./configure --prefix=/usr", it builds perfectly but if I use %configure build fails for 64 bit. After examining the log of both the build I found that %configure passes a lot of parameters while "./configure --prefix=/usr" does not. How can I fix this error? Failed build's log: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2906677&name=build.log Successful Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2906646 Aditya Patawari http://blog.adityapatawari.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adimania India On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Aditya Patawari <adima...@gmail.com> wrote: > Packaged! Need someone to review it. > > Bugzilla Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684446 > > -- > Aditya Patawari > http://blog.adityapatawari.com/ > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adimania > India > > > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Aditya Patawari <adima...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I have informed upstream regarding an error of undeclared variable. >> The post is under moderation. I'll update the url as soon as it is >> moderated. >> >> -- >> Aditya Patawari >> http://blog.adityapatawari.com/ >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adimania >> India >> >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Rahul Sundaram <methe...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 03/09/2011 08:45 PM, Aditya Patawari wrote: >>>> Hi Rahul, >>>> >>>> It is not written anywhere that GPL is being used but I found the >>>> notice below in one of the files: >>>> >>>> # >>>> # Copyright (c) 2009 Mark Heily <m...@heily.com> >>>> # >>>> # Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software for any >>>> # purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above >>>> # copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies. >>>> # >>>> # THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE AUTHOR DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES >>>> # WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF >>>> # MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE FOR >>>> # ANY SPECIAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES >>>> # WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN >>>> # ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF >>>> # OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE. >>>> # >>>> >>>> Should I assume it is GPLed or write to the developer about the license? >>> >>> This is not GPL at all. Usually libraries are not licensed under GPL. >>> This is a MIT license, specifically old style with a legal disclaimer. >>> >>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:MIT#Old_Style_with_legal_disclaimer_2 >>> >>> Use the license tag "MIT" for this variant. >>> >>> Rahul >>> _______________________________________________ >>> india mailing list >>> india@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/india >>> >> > _______________________________________________ india mailing list india@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/india
