On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Manokaran K <[email protected]> wrote:
> IMO, its not allowed. If its allowed then you can take Linux, release it
> under BSD, fork it and then refuse to share source for all the changes you
> make to it! Ethics tech would be better served if it did not venture into
> creating its own licences and stick to established ones.


They are free to license the bundle under their own license with the
explicit clause that individual components retain their original
license terms.
___________________________________

What is the difference between an "aggregate" and other kinds of
"modified versions"? (#MereAggregation)

An "aggregate" consists of a number of separate programs, distributed
together on the same CD-ROM or other media. The GPL permits you to
create and distribute an aggregate, even when the licenses of the
other software are non-free or GPL-incompatible. The only condition is
that you cannot release the aggregate under a license that prohibits
users from exercising rights that each program's individual license
would grant them.

Where's the line between two separate programs, and one program with
two parts? This is a legal question, which ultimately judges will
decide. We believe that a proper criterion depends both on the
mechanism of communication (exec, pipes, rpc, function calls within a
shared address space, etc.) and the semantics of the communication
(what kinds of information are interchanged).

If the modules are included in the same executable file, they are
definitely combined in one program. If modules are designed to run
linked together in a shared address space, that almost surely means
combining them into one program.

By contrast, pipes, sockets and command-line arguments are
communication mechanisms normally used between two separate programs.
So when they are used for communication, the modules normally are
separate programs. But if the semantics of the communication are
intimate enough, exchanging complex internal data structures, that too
could be a basis to consider the two parts as combined into a larger
program.

__________________________________________




Best

A. Mani



A. Mani
[Last_Name. First_Name Format]
CU, ASL, AMS, ISRS, CLC, CMS
HomePage: http://www.logicamani.in
Blog: http://logicamani.blogspot.in/
_______________________________________________
ILUGC Mailing List:
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
ILUGC Mailing List Guidelines:
http://ilugc.in/mailinglist-guidelines

Reply via email to