On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 7:53 AM, ஆமாச்சு <[email protected]> wrote: > On Monday 27 August 2012 10:40 AM, satyaakam goswami wrote: >> the other idea is to write to the two >> actresses and asking for permission if its ok to use there images like >> this , then our friends will be happy . > > normally, though you may be the actor, writer, worker its the producer, > publisher, employer who owns the copyright.
yes add agency to the list > > so, i can only say, if you ask them they would say ask the one who funds me. we are presuming why not give them a chance, before jumping to conclusions. >> one fine morning, what if shreya & anushka passes across me & I take a > snap of them and use it? who owns the copyright, then? it becomes > intrusion of privacy ;-) again two different presumptions , so far i have seen kalyan verma (http://kalyanvarma.net/) is doing something in that direction again his website says it is under CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 , talking about the CC as a license i still have to read http://freeculture.org/blog/2012/08/27/stop-the-inclusion-of-proprietary-licenses-in-creative-commons-4-0/ in order to understand how it is inclusive or exclusive and what the author is trying to point what is not ok in CC version 4.0 . the picture i get is no matter what systems we are talking about they are not perfect or still involving and Law of the land at large has lots of mines and has catching up to do . >> at times, beyond abiding by laws & fighting within system - civil > dis-obedience has helped :-) What is your suggestion give up taking pictures or using pictures :-) , yes this is now becoming way OT we need to meetup sometime to talk about it. -Satya _______________________________________________ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
