On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 3:36 PM, 0 <[email protected]> wrote: >> I would say that the post under consideration falls fairly under points >> 2 and 6 above and is not OT. > > I agree with you that the above mentioned points are relevant to the > list in some way, but where do we draw the line ? I am sure, there are > going to a bunch of news articles every day on DRM, patents, copyright > etc. For example, the recent controversy over Blizzard and Diablo III on > GNU/Linux (over wine), >
[OT] is not meant for discussion on things directly related to Free s/w or Open Source philosophy. This particular article is further concerned with h/w that may be used with GNU/Linux. For your requirements.... Maybe we can have more descriptive tags like [A] : advocacy [T]: Technical [P]: Free s/w Philosophy (for real articles on free s/w philosophy) (improve this ) Best A. Mani -- A. Mani CU, ASL, CLC, AMS, CMS http://www.logicamani.in http://www.logicamani.co.cc _______________________________________________ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
