On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 4:57 PM, kenneth gonsalves <[email protected]> wrote: > congratulations - I am sure you went through each of these links to find > out where they were on the site, in what context they were there, > whether they were put there by the authors of the site and how visible > they are to the viewers of the site. >
Those were just some random stats I found after reading your original FUD. But then, I'm sure that when you were saying "site" and not "page", you went through all the sites to do your due diligence? > And here's one more which you can add to your collection of useless > statistics: > > site:microsoft.com linux 322,000 > Why is that useless? According to the Linux Foundation [1], Microsoft was one of the largest corporate contributors of Linux in 2011. [1] http://arstechnica.com/business/2012/04/linux-kernel-in-2011-15-million-total-lines-of-code-and-microsoft-is-a-top-contributor/ -- http://about.me/rosh _______________________________________________ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
