> I think I have some solid evidence for my claim that RMS is mischievous:
Some more evidence: 1. Stallman named his famous license as the GPL which stands for General Public License. This creates the impression that this is the license which the general public wants. And also that other licenses are not for the general public but for the big bad corporates. Why didn't he call it Free Software License or FSL for short? Purposely to misinterpret, IMO. 2. Also, Stalmman and his FSF folks give bad and critical expansions for acronymns which they don't like. For example: DRM: Originally stood for Digital Rights Management; RMS called it Digital Restrictions Management. CBDTPA: Consumer Broadband Data... something Act, The FSF expands it to: "Consume But Don't Try Programming Act. Microsoft retorted by renaming DRM to RMS, calling it Rights Management System!;-) Stallman couldn't respond because it was his own initials ;-) A funny game is being played here, for the minds and hearts of the computing masses. ...KRS _______________________________________________ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
