Hi,
>> Even by a long mile I don't think gimp will match Photoshop. > What made you think so? What's in PS that's not in GIMP? We use GIMP for > all of our graphics. Please state the reasons. While I don't know if I agree with the original claim, I'd just add that adding an effect may be simple point and click in PS while it is a little cumbersome in GIMP. That does not make GIMP inferior, but artists are not geeks (not tech geeks, to be correct.). > Wrong. There are no training institutes about how to use Firefox does But what is it that firefox would do that is not already done with other browsers? And when was the last time we did anything out of the ordinary with firefox (or IE or chrome)? But image manipulation, to some degree, is not doing the ordinary alone. Again even the new ones are probably a mix and match of the existing ones. But if they are not straight forward, then they are as good as not there. Problem is yet again the user base. If you asked the community, they'd tell you how to do with python script for GIMP. But how many times are python coders doing image manipulation? Just curious. I could be entirely wrong. Abishek _______________________________________________ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
