On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 11:59 +0530, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote: > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > does that mean that redhat does not have a centralised DMS? Or is it > a > > bad idea for a company to have one? > > To answer the second question first. > > I think that the idea that a company should have a single set of > application stack is a good one. It enables and empowers the IT > department. However, the agility that is provided by a set of systems > within a variety is also something that teams benefit from. As long as > data is not kept within silos making it difficult to cross-talk, > variety could probably be encouraged. > > The answer to the first part of the question, like I mentioned > earlier, is that there is no single system.
this looks good: http://www.openkm.com/Technology.html pros: 1. no separate 'community' edition 2. supports postgresql cons: 1. Java (but then the company that it is for is infested with java guys) 2. GPL (but then I will not be contributing code so it is not a real issue) Will look into it further and report. -- regards KG http://lawgon.livejournal.com Coimbatore LUG rox http://ilugcbe.techstud.org/ _______________________________________________ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
