On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 06:08:46PM +0530, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: > in the mailing list guidelines I see a sentence 'search ... in > google.com or any other search engines. Although I am not sure whether > there is a viable foss search engine, ilugc should not promote a a > non-free search engine by name. And if it must, how about this: > > http://duckduckgo.com/
Could you please let us know why Duck Duck Go is a more sane alternative to Google? I presume you refer to the fact that they don't store cookies, IP addresses and personal information. But database wise, they still depend on Yahoo's BOSS. Thanks. Kumar _______________________________________________ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
