On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 22:19 +0530, Mehul Ved wrote: > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves > <[email protected]> wrote: > > hi, > > > > after some years of experimentation, I find a setting of 3.5 on > > spamassassin along with some training eliminates 99% of spam - and > very > > rarely catches non spam. > > Doesn't it also depend on how you've setup the breakup of the score?
I have not gone that deep. 3.4 is too low and some things get marked as spam. 3.5 is perfect for me. -- regards KG http://lawgon.livejournal.com _______________________________________________ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
