Ok, so even if all syntactic predicates have failed in a particular rule, that rule is still included as "matched" in that analysis! Is this true or are my tests wrong? This is not what I hoped. I was hoping that upon complete failure of all syntactic predicates in a rule, the rule becomes disregarded, and that "disregarding" is cascaded as far up as possible, and an alternative path is attempted. Is this how it's works, or am I missing something? Or is there a way, using actions, to "force" the exiting of a particular rule as if it had not been matched at all?
Many regards, N --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to il-antlr-interest@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to il-antlr-interest+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
