Loring Craymer wrote: > Not true; your example can be interpreted either as > > (expr1: PREFIX_1 (expr2: PREFIX_2 SUFFIX) SUFFIX ) > > or as > > (expr1: PREFIX_1 (expr2: PREFIX_2) SUFFIX) SUFFIX > > with the extra SUFFIX belonging to something else
So, hazarding a guess, would it be okay if expr was EOF-terminated? -- Sam Barnett-Cormack List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to il-antlr-interest@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to il-antlr-interest+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
