At 00:06 2/07/2009, jared.bunt...@peachjean.com wrote: >It's been awhile since I've written grammars, but what about: > >code: (proc | func)* > -> ^(CODE ^(PROCS proc*) ^(FUNCS func*)) > >I seem to recall that this works fairly well...
And if it doesn't, you can try the more explicit variant: code : (p+=proc | f+=func)* -> ^(CODE ^(PROCS $p*) ^(FUNCS $f*)) ; (Or leave out the PROCS/FUNCS nodes if you just want to reorder the procedures/functions without actually grouping them in a subtree.) List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to il-antlr-interest@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to il-antlr-interest+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
