On Friday 26 June 2009 1:48:11 pm Jim Idle wrote: > Also, I am wondering if you are taking the 'right' approach with your > code. If you send the source I'll take a look.
There's also a value of 0xbaadf00d used by Windows for freed or uninitialized pointers ... I've seen it before but cannot remember specifically if it's from the debugger or one of the libraries. Regardless, you can not (and should not) depend on any values in uninitialized or newly allocated storage. > On Jun 26, 2009, at 1:24 PM, "Xie, Linlin" <linlin....@siemens.com> > > I’ve noticed that that empty pointers are all (am I right?) initiali > > zed to be 0xcdcdcdcd by default. Looks like it’s a debugging value c > > oming from the C runtime library. I wonder if you have your reason f List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to il-antlr-interest@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to il-antlr-interest+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
