On Tue, 3 March, 2009 9:07 pm, Jim Idle wrote: > Sam Barnett-Cormack wrote: > >> Jim Idle wrote: >> >>> Sam Barnett-Cormack wrote: >>> >> <SNIP> >> >>> I was trying to look at your grammar for you but the one you have >>> attached is missing some token defs: > > I presume that you saw I sent you the corrected grammar off list right?
I saw it aftewards - my next task when I return to it this evening will be to make sure I understand it. What do you think about the fact that newlines are definitely not significant? Does that make the grammar inherently ambiguous and one has to choose an interpretation to favour? Sam List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
