The DT I am discussing has no clear problem to solve, the appointment is
not clear, I have been asking for a WG but only DT was done. The DT has no
milestones and no clear objectives, is it a DT or a WG. We don't need the
DT to adopt or agree on any real draft effort submitted, it is the
community that adopt or disagrees the output of any DT.
AB
On Saturday, October 12, 2013, Melinda Shore wrote:
> On Oct 12, 2013 6:51 AM, "Adrian Farrel"
> <adr...@olddog.co.uk<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'adr...@olddog.co.uk');>>
> wrote:
> > I don't understand your assertion that there is no procedure in the IETF
> to
> > support the existence of a Design Team.
>
> I'd be sorry to see this discussion dragged down a procedural rathole.
>
> Melinda
>
