Just to clarify, I am no saying that today we are leaderless. In fact I
think we have a very good leadership.
What I am saying is that if we that we want our leaders to only
moderate discussion we are in a big problem.
Regards,
as
On 10/10/13 4:52 PM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
> > From: Arturo Servin <arturo.ser...@gmail.com>
>
> > Then we have a big problem as organization, we are then leaderless.
>
> I'm not sure this is true. The IETF worked quite well (and produced a lot of
> good stuff) back in, e.g. the Phill Gross era, when I am pretty sure Phill's
> model of his job was indeed as a 'facilitator', not a 'leader' in the sense
> you seem to be thinking of. So why do we now need a 'leader'?
>
> Noel
>
