On 9/11/13 9:39 PM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 6:45 AM, joel jaeggli <joe...@bogus.com > <mailto:joe...@bogus.com>> wrote: > > The queue for dicussion of this point is closed. If there needs to be an > appeal on this point now or in the future, then I'll be happy to help > someone write it, but I consider that dicussion settled for the purposes > of a draft that has already been tested for wg acceptance/wglc/ietf-lc > > > To clarify - you're talking only about the discussion on whether this > draft is in scope? Or are you saying that you consider all discussion of > this document in this IETF last call settled?
The discussion of whether the IETF, or this working group is a suitable location. It was my opinion that the working group should revist the document itself given what I saw in the last call. joel
