Hi Tony, thanks for the review. Apologies for the long delay replying.
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Tony Hansen <t...@att.com> wrote: > I have been selected as the Applications Area Directorate reviewer for this > draft (for background on appsdir, please see > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/ApplicationsAreaDirectorate). > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may > receive. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before > posting a new version of the draft. > > > > Document: draft-ietf-repute-model-08 > Title: A Model for Reputation Reporting > > Reviewer: Tony Hansen > Review Date: 2013-08-29 > IESG Telechat Date: 9/12 > IETF Last Call Expires: LC for 07 expired on 2013-08-29, but 08 superseded > that > > > Summary: > The document is ready for publication. Minor notes follow that can be fixed > in AUTH48. > > The document describes a model for reputation services, particularly those > being produced by the Repute WG. It follows the recommendations of RFc4101 > for describing a protocol model, which requires answers to 1) the problem the > protocol is trying to achieve, 2) the meaning of messages transmitted, and 3) > important unobvious features of the protocol. This document accomplishes its > goals quite well. > > > > ==== ORGANIZATIONAL COMMENT ==== > > Section 3 "High-Level Architecture" starts with an extended example of where > a reputation service would fit into an existing service. Finally, more than a > page later, it starts describing the architecture that is supposed to be the > topic of this section. I suggest that the section be split into two, with the > beginning given the heading along the lines of "Example of a Reputation > Service Being Used", and the "High-Level Architecture" heading moved right > before the paragraph that starts "This document outlines". Alternatively, add > subsection titles. > > Seems reasonable. I'll do that in the next version. > > ==== MINOR NITS ==== > > Changes below are marked with >>><<<. > > All applied as well. Thanks again, -MSK
