> In Section 2: > > 'a. The code points must be from a space designated as "Specification > Required" (where an RFC will be used as the stable reference), > "RFC Required", "IETF Review", or "Standards Action".' > > I suggest not having the comment (where) and leaving it to RFC 5226 to > define "Specification Required".
Yes, except that's not what this means. I tripped over the same text, and I suggest rephrasing it this way: NEW The code points must be from a space designated as "Specification Required" (in cases where an RFC will be used as the stable reference), "RFC Required", "IETF Review", or "Standards Action". Barry
