On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 3:46 PM, manning bill <bmann...@isi.edu> wrote:
> > the question is not that "nobody" checks type 99, the question is > "is the rate of adoption > of type 99 -changing- in relation to type 16? > As John pointed out, support for checking type 99 has decreased and continues to decrease rather than increase. So waiting longer is not going to solve the issue. Putting a statement in an RFC does not mean that the world will automatically advance towards that particular end state. Forcing a WG to adopt a position to suit another constituency is not going to lead them to advocate for that position in deployment constituencies. Particularly when the original constituency does nothing to advance deployment. -- Website: http://hallambaker.com/
