> LC should not be treated as a right of passage, to test the patience of > folks who have developed a document.
rite? Lloyd Wood http://sat-net.com/L.Wood/
- Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sp... Stephen Farrell
- RE: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sp... l.wood
- Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sp... Thomas Narten
- Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sp... S Moonesamy
- Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sp... Pete Resnick
- Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sp... Scott Brim
- Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sp... Pete Resnick
- Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sp... Barry Leiba
- Visibility of shepherd writeup Carsten Bormann
- The Last Call social contract (was - Re: Rude respons... Dave Crocker
- RE: The Last Call social contract (was - Re: Rude res... l.wood
- RE: The Last Call social contract (was - Re: Rude res... Dave Cridland
- Re: The Last Call social contract (was - Re: Rude res... Scott Brim
- Re: The Last Call social contract (was - Re: Rude res... Dave Crocker
- Re: The Last Call social contract (was - Re: Rude res... Hector Santos
- Re: The Last Call social contract (was - Re: Rude res... S Moonesamy
- Re: The Last Call social contract (was - Re: Rude res... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sp... Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis... John Leslie
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis... S Moonesamy
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis... manning bill
