AD hat squarely on my head.
On 8/21/13 1:29 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
Oh. Now I understand.
You are trying to impose new requirements on the original work, many
years after the IETF approved it.
Thanks. Very helpful.
That's not an appropriate response. It is certainly not helpful to me as
the consensus caller. And it is rude.
It's perfectly reasonable to say, "This would constitute a new
requirement and I don't think there is a good justification to pursue
that line." The sarcasm is not reasonable.
Please stop.
pr
--
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478
